
Fundbrief
ABOUT US
We provide professional-grade, ready-to-use newsletters and articles purposed for funds to display on their websites. A clear, concise analysis of major economic trends, market shifts, and present deal flow specifically curated for your fund to integrate into its dedicated news section.
Our ethos derives from accommodating funds with the opportunity to publish high quality, reliable weekly news updates, saving time and bolstering online appeal in the process. We track the key business and economic developments so you can focus on what matters the most.
Through timely news pertaining to macroeconomic trends, concurrent deal flow, and financial markets, we strive to strengthen your fund's position as an incisive investment vehicle.

Hassan Rehman
Founder, Head of Operations
"The ability to distill complex coverage with conviction is a strategic imperative in the financial landscape, and yet, in the absence of time, many firms remain needlessly constrained from producing original, high quality news sections. Fundbrief was born as a means to resolve this seemingly simple, yet pervasive issue faced by a multitude of firms within the sector."




Standard Subcription
399
Every month
Subscribe to Fundbrief's monthly plan for 2 weekly articles, a weekly newsletter, and a monthly newsletter.
Valid for 12 months
+ 7 day free trial
All pieces are to be written in size 14 ui-serif font.
Weekly articles are approximately 320 words in length.
Weekly newsletters are approximately 800 words in length.
Monthly newsletters are approximately 1200 words in length.
SAMPLE ARTICLE
The Art of the Tariff: An Overview of Trump's 'Tariff Hit List'
Reciprocal tariffs, a vital pillar underpinning the incumbent administration’s economic agenda, have recently reignited in the face of an August 1st deadline. Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, the President has sought reciprocal tariffs against 69 trading partners under the political disguise of an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security of the United States”. The enactment is expected to raise the effective tariff rate on US imports to its highest level since 1934.
Amongst the list of notable names inscribed in the President’s ‘tariff hit list’ lies Taiwan, a country which stands to face a 20 per cent tariff rate on the majority of its exports, with sectoral tariffs on semiconductors and other electronics still subject to impending negotiations. Taiwan’s President, Lai Ching-te, later described the act during a press briefing as “temporary”, and expressed his ambitions to “continue negations and strive for a rate that’s more favourable for Taiwan”. Last year, Taiwan held the 6th largest trade deficit with the United States, exporting approximately $74 billion more than they imported.
Swiss policymakers were left in shock after their nation unexpectedly awoke to a 39 per cent tariff rate, a rate remarkably higher than those imposed upon their European counterparts, on the grounds of accumulating one of the largest imbalanced trade surpluses in the world with the United States. In 2024, Switzerland exported roughly $60.9 billion worth of goods into the United States. The Swiss government openly lamented the move to be of “great regret”, despite their seemingly productive efforts in attempting to conceive an equitable framework trade deal.
India is expected to bear a 25 per cent tariff rate, in tandem with a presently undecided penalty for its role in the purchasing of Russian oil and weapons amidst the Ukraine-Russian war, according to a Truth Social post by the President. Although the newly imposed tariff rate marks a marginal reduction from the 27% tariff rate initially proposed in April, many analysts are now expecting the tariff to weigh in on India’s rate of GDP growth, particularly in light of their regional developing counterparts facing lower tariff rates. Nomura, a global investment bank, predicts the tariffs to reduce India’s GDP by 0.2%.
The UK and the EU have managed to remain comparatively unscathed given their respective successes in reaching a framework trade deal prior to the deadline; the former has been struck with a 10 per cent tariff, whilst the latter is set to a face 15 per cent tariff. In contrast, Brazil has been subjected a 50% tariff rate, with sectoral exemptions placed on aircraft and energy.
.
The President’s re-establishment of the global economic order is beginning to take shape. Will the use of politically obstructive means to achieve economically sound outcomes harm global growth?